From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264379AbTLBU4S (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:56:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264383AbTLBU4S (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:56:18 -0500 Received: from websrv.werbeagentur-aufwind.de ([213.239.197.241]:13725 "EHLO mail.werbeagentur-aufwind.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264379AbTLBU4P (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:56:15 -0500 Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.0-test11 missing acpi-performance interface on centrino From: Christophe Saout To: Robert Freund Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5332.1070389142@www60.gmx.net> References: <1070384429.21490.4.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <5332.1070389142@www60.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1070398575.10571.4.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:56:16 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Di, den 02.12.2003 schrieb Robert Freund um 19:19: > > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > > > In 2.6.0-test11 the acpi/performance interface is missing on centrino. > > > > I would say this is simply because ACPI is not used within the centrino > > cpufreq interface driver. You should use the sysfs interface anyway. > > The latter is certainly right... but since there is a kernel config option > that lets you add the /proc/acpi/.../performance interface explicitly and it > doesn't work, I consider it a bug. This is only a suboption to the acpi cpufreq driver. -- Christophe Saout Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html