From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264401AbTLGKcx (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:32:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264406AbTLGKcx (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:32:53 -0500 Received: from legolas.restena.lu ([158.64.1.34]:20426 "EHLO smtp.restena.lu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264401AbTLGKcw (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:32:52 -0500 Subject: Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found? From: Craig Bradney To: Ian Kumlien Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1070756987.1987.7.camel@big.pomac.com> References: <1070739194.1985.4.camel@big.pomac.com> <1070756427.2093.2.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <1070756987.1987.7.camel@big.pomac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1070793169.2079.10.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:32:49 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:29, Ian Kumlien wrote: > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:20, Craig Bradney wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:33, Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > Hi, i'm now running this patch and it survived my grep in /usr/src. > > > > > > It's mainly a correction of the apic patch and the ACPI halt disconnect > > > patch that was originally done for 2.6... > > > > Correction? how so? code looks the same, although the line numbers are > > completely different for mpparse.c and at that location there is > > different code. (Havent checked the disconnect) > > this is for 2.4.23 =) duh.. ok :) > > Or do u just mean combination of the two patches? > > Combination + for 2.4.23 > > > > I'll get back to you about uptime, but i think this is it... > > > > Why do you think the disconnect is also related? (given some are just > > running the APIC patch and having (less/)no issues? > > Since i had issues with just the apic patch, as stated in my mail. oic.. sorry.. must have missed that. > > > > Although i would prefer a not so workaroundish approach =) > > > > 23 hrs now.. > > I'm at 5:06 and thats a record for it running with apic. 1d 9h here now.. I remembered I also dont have preempt still, but I am happy with it if it stays like this. The next time I need to reboot (or get a hang), I'll recompile with preempt it and try again. Craig