From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264588AbTLVXsk (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:48:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264591AbTLVXsk (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:48:40 -0500 Received: from ns1.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.66]:12496 "HELO mail.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264588AbTLVXsj (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:48:39 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.0 modules don't link properly From: Andre Tomt To: bill davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072136923.1088.249.camel@slurv.pasop.tomt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:48:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 00:17, bill davidsen wrote: > I tried building 2.6.0-final on a new whitebox-3.0-final install, and > the modules_install produced thousands of unresolved symbols. This built > on another machine I've been running and updating since the 2.5.3x days, > so there might be something I've missed, but I don't quite see what it > would be. > > Whitebox is built from RH-ES-3.0 source, so the only things I updated > were the procps and modutils, using the last tar which didn't have "pre" > in the name. I see that there is a new tar, out nearly ten hours so it > must be stable, which has jumped from 0.9.15 to 3.0.15-pre1, but I'm > happily using something months old on other systems. > > Can someone toss me a clue? Has anyone had a working build with > RH-ES-3.0? Yes, I know other things need to be done before I can > actually run the kernel, but being able to build would be nice, since I > got a new test system just for 2.6 test/demo use. Sounds like a case of missing module-init-tools.