From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261605AbTLWPit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:38:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261606AbTLWPis (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:38:48 -0500 Received: from node-d-1fcf.a2000.nl ([62.195.31.207]:57473 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261605AbTLWPir (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:38:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Question on LFS in Redhat From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Dale Amon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031223151042.GE9089@vnl.com> References: <20031223151042.GE9089@vnl.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yT6xnuAg4DKgnaZ7EKh/" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1072193917.5262.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:38:38 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-yT6xnuAg4DKgnaZ7EKh/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 16:10, Dale Amon wrote: > If there are any Redhat folk around... could you tell > me if you've included the LFS patches in your: >=20 > 2.4.16-9smp Red Hat never released a 2.4.16 kernel for production use. However we also never released a 2.4 kernel with the large BLOCK patch. All 2.4 kernels we shipped can do files > 2 Gb of course. --=-yT6xnuAg4DKgnaZ7EKh/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/6GF9xULwo51rQBIRAkwsAJ48Z/z2dhuf7pbPynZPIumiKiTucQCfTGIM W7CK35MJRuSkqaPc9tR565s= =sdjz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yT6xnuAg4DKgnaZ7EKh/--