From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263130AbTLWWYS (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:24:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263172AbTLWWYS (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:24:18 -0500 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:31236 "EHLO kerberos.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263130AbTLWWYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:24:15 -0500 Subject: Re: DEVFS is very good compared to UDEV From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Jari Soderholm Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072218249.5813.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:24:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 22:20, Jari Soderholm wrote: > Why could you develop it so that UDEV could create those > actual device files there also, then most linux > users would not need those horrible scipts anymore. > All that is then needed link from /sysfs to /dev dir. Well, udev way of doing things is very similar to Solaris. While booting with -r, or by creating /.reconfigure, Solaris kernel scans the hardware and creates entries in /devices tree. The /dev entries are just symlinks to /devices entries.