From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263441AbTLXEiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:38:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263447AbTLXEiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:38:12 -0500 Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.116.51]:3823 "EHLO amber.ccs.neu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263441AbTLXEiG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:38:06 -0500 Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev From: Stan Bubrouski To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20031224151314.700680fe.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20031224151314.700680fe.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072240684.2947.184.camel@duergar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:38:05 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 23:13, Rusty Russell wrote: > Badley, I ask you in all seriousness: will you take up the challenge, > and fill the gaping hole which we've all felt for so long in the Linux > community? To give raw, unvarnished feedback, unconfused by the > complexities of code? > > I, for one, see the future lies in your posts. > Rusty. Umm well said? For the sake of completeness, I direct 'Badley' to the UDEV FAQ for further info on his future crusade. LOL. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ And umm, can we kill this thread, I foresee a flamefest in the works. -sb