From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265143AbTL2UYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:24:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265158AbTL2UYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:24:50 -0500 Received: from CPE-24-163-214-136.mn.rr.com ([24.163.214.136]:6596 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265143AbTL2UYq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:24:46 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.0-mm2 From: Shawn To: Stef van der Made Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <3FF08057.7010405@planet.nl> References: <20031229013223.75c531ed.akpm@osdl.org> <3FF08057.7010405@planet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1072729484.8769.1.camel@www.enodev.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:24:44 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Stef: Andrew has explained in the past that the -mm branch is not the official kernel branch. I don't know what's happening with what could be called 2.6.0-pre*, and don't know if it exists anywhere but in Andrew's head. On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 13:28, Stef van der Made wrote: > Dear Andrew, > > Is it possible to use the old schema of pre1, pre2 und so weiter > releases so that we can use the incremental patch sets again. > > Thanks, > > Stef