From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
Date: 30 Dec 2003 12:44:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072809890.2839.24.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility.
I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices
to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)).
What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi?
Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this,
so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can
pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.
In the long term, I think libata will end up assuming much of the role
that ide-scsi does now, but since it doesn't interface to a lot of
existing motherboard chipsets, we're going to need ide-scsi around for a
while at least.
James
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 18:44 James Bottomley [this message]
2003-12-30 22:18 ` Willem Riede
2004-01-03 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-28 13:24 ` Willem Riede
2004-01-30 22:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-31 0:48 ` Willem Riede
2004-01-31 21:42 ` The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 1/3] Willem Riede
2004-01-31 21:45 ` The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 2/3] Willem Riede
2004-01-31 21:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-31 22:41 ` The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 3/3 bis] Willem Riede
2004-01-31 21:59 ` The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x [PATCH 3/3] Willem Riede
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-05 22:01 The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-05 22:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 22:00 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-07 22:22 ` bill davidsen
[not found] <mailman.1072462764.22951.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2003-12-29 4:57 ` Pete Zaitcev
2003-12-29 13:07 ` Willem Riede
2003-12-26 18:12 Willem Riede
2003-12-27 2:09 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-27 12:43 ` Stef van der Made
[not found] ` <20031227131724.GG1277@linnie.riede.org>
2003-12-28 21:45 ` Stef van der Made
2004-01-03 14:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-03 14:18 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072809890.2839.24.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wrlk@riede.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®