From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: SE Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>, Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch] Fix block device inode list corruptions
Date: 04 Feb 2004 15:27:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1075908464.1998.189.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1261 bytes --]
Hi,
I've been chasing a weird SELinux bug which shows up mostly when doing
installs of a dev-* rpm (ie. creating and overwriting lots of block
device inodes), but which I've also seen when doing mkinitrd.
It turned out not to be an SELinux problem at all, but a core VFS
S_ISBLK bug. It seems that SELinux simply widens the race window.
The code at fault is fs/fs-writeback.c:__mark_inode_dirty():
/*
* Only add valid (hashed) inodes to the superblock's
* dirty list. Add blockdev inodes as well.
*/
if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
if (hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash))
goto out;
if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR))
goto out;
}
The "I_FREEING|I_CLEAR" condition was added after the ISBLK/unhashed
tests were already in the source, but I can't see any reason why we'd
want the I_FREEING test not to apply to block devices. And indeed, this
results in all sorts of inode list corruptions. Simply moving the
I_FREEING|I_CLEAR test out of the protection of the S_ISBLK() condition
fixes things entirely.
The exiting 2.6 kernel will reliably fail on me in about 2 seconds once
"rpm -Uvh --force dev*.rpm" starts its actual installation of the new
inodes. With the patch below I can't reproduce it at all.
--Stephen
[-- Attachment #2: vfs-blkdev-list.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 583 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.1/fs/fs-writeback.c.=K0001=.orig
+++ linux-2.6.1/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -87,12 +87,11 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *in
* Only add valid (hashed) inodes to the superblock's
* dirty list. Add blockdev inodes as well.
*/
- if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
+ if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
if (hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash))
goto out;
- if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR))
- goto out;
- }
+ if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR))
+ goto out;
/*
* If the inode was already on s_dirty or s_io, don't
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 15:27 Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2004-02-04 22:19 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1075908464.1998.189.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®