From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263620AbUBDREW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:04:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262686AbUBDRET (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:04:19 -0500 Received: from adsl-64-109-89-108.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net ([64.109.89.108]:30849 "EHLO redscar") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263620AbUBDREQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:04:16 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6: Voyager requires SMP? From: James Bottomley To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Han Boetes , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20040204082213.GT4443@fs.tum.de> References: <20040127233402.6f5d3497.akpm@osdl.org> <20040128083645.GI2650@boetes.org> <20040130025142.GE3004@fs.tum.de> <20040130060028.GB13535@boetes.org> <20040204082213.GT4443@fs.tum.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9) Date: 04 Feb 2004 12:04:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1075914250.2028.77.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Adrian Bunk wrote: > @James: > Is X86_VOYAGER=y and SMP=n a valid configuration that should compile, or > should X86_VOYAGER select SMP? It is a valid (but rather rare configuration). I know it's broken but haven't paid much attention to fixing it. Even the debian and Red Hat boot systems for voyager have SMP kernels. I'll look and see if there's a quick fix. James