From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267065AbUBEW75 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:59:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267080AbUBEW74 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:59:56 -0500 Received: from gate.firmix.at ([80.109.18.208]:55215 "EHLO gate.firmix.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267065AbUBEW66 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:58:58 -0500 Subject: RE: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel From: Bernd Petrovitsch To: "Tillier, Fabian" Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, infiniband-general@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB01DB96FA@mercury.infiniconsys.com> References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB01DB96FA@mercury.infiniconsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: http://www.firmix.at/ Message-Id: <1076021915.3805.44.camel@gimli.at.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:58:35 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 23:17, Tillier, Fabian wrote: [...] > about the atomic abstraction for the x86 platforms. My last question > was not a yes/no question so I'm not sure what you're answering with > your "No" - your reply makes no sense. To clarify, the answer to a You didn't get the point that your quoting style (Text above - full quote below) is - ahemm - deprecated und really unreadable and the "No" is not related to the to-include-or-not-include-the-driver question. Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services