From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265285AbUBFCNu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265316AbUBFCNu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:13:50 -0500 Received: from bhhdoa.org.au ([216.17.101.199]:60681 "EHLO bhhdoa.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265285AbUBFCNt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:13:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1076034783.4022fcdfd4669@vds.kolivas.org> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:33:03 +1100 From: Con Kolivas To: Ryan Reich Cc: linux kernel mailing list , apt-drink@telefonica.net Subject: Re: 2.6.2-ck1 References: <200402052109.24122.kernel@kolivas.org> <200402060943.40973.kernel@kolivas.org> <200402060953.38015.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Ryan Reich : > Yes, of course I should have done that. It does seem to be the bootsplash, > though Rafael Rodriguez disagrees. Probably a .config difference. Ok good. A different framebuffer driver or something could be enough to account for it working on one config and not another. Sorry but i'm unable to debug the bootsplash bug for you though. Con > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:51, Ryan Reich wrote: > > > I have only your patch and the 2.6.0-test9 (the latest on bootsplash.org > > > thus far) bootsplash patch. I'll send you my .config separately. > > > > Ok well the obvious thing to ask is can you try without the bootsplash > patch