From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264887AbUBFMvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:51:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264919AbUBFMvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:51:12 -0500 Received: from legolas.restena.lu ([158.64.1.34]:24735 "EHLO smtp.restena.lu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264887AbUBFMvI (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 07:51:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [ACPI] acpi problem with nforce motherboards and ethernet From: Craig Bradney To: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" Cc: Daniel Drake , Luis Miguel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= , david+challenge-response@blue-labs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.verweij@student.tudelft.nl In-Reply-To: <40237765.6080602@gmx.de> References: <402298C7.5050405@wanadoo.es> <40229D2C.20701@blue-labs.org> <4022B55B.1090309@wanadoo.es> <20040205154059.6649dd74.akpm@osdl.org> <1076026496.16107.23.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <4022DE3C.1080905@wanadoo.es> <4022E209.3040909@gmx.de> <4022E3C8.4020704@wanadoo.es> <4022E69B.5070606@gmx.de> <1076029281.23586.36.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <40235DBA.4030408@gmx.de> <1076062051.16107.49.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <40236F06.5050103@gmx.de> <40236207.7050104@reactivated.net> <402374B0.8080907@gmx.de> <40237765.6080602@gmx.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K3JYy4HhW+MoPUULqWur" Message-Id: <1076071864.1036.3.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:51:04 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-K3JYy4HhW+MoPUULqWur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 12:15, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > > Daniel Drake wrote: > >=20 > >> Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, then it makes sense, so you are using APIc with CPU Disconnect=20 > >>> and Ross' patch. This explains your low idle temps. As I said this=20 > >>> config doesn't work for me. > >> > >> > >> > >> Have you experimented with the new apic_tack boot options in Ross's=20 > >> latest patches? > >> apic_tack=3D2 seems to work best for me. > >=20 > >=20 > > Stupid me. I haven't thoruoughly read the text. I have not activated th= e=20 > > patch, so I'll try this. thx for pointing out.. >=20 > OK, I appended apic_tack=3D2 and yes, it survives several hdparms! Great,= =20 > so gonna try if it is really stable.Then I can try =3D1. CPU cooling down= .=20 > Already at 46=B0C. :-) >=20 > Not bad,not bad, though I saw a small performace degration: hdparm gives=20 > me 60-61mb/s instead of >62mb/s, but I won't complain. :-) >=20 Ahh yes.. missing the kernel line argument will make a difference. I'm running apic_tack=3D2 as well. From what I remember =3D2 was the "better" patch option if it made your system stable. Craig --=-K3JYy4HhW+MoPUULqWur Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAI424i+pIEYrr7mQRAvHuAJ9M4+fq68daj12hCpIdWN+vtH0ezQCggYhU giIoPSX92+xXTYz7SmDUNlE= =ZXXp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K3JYy4HhW+MoPUULqWur--