From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265436AbUBPIbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:31:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265438AbUBPIbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:31:09 -0500 Received: from smtp3.clb.oleane.net ([213.56.31.19]:23765 "EHLO smtp3.clb.oleane.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265436AbUBPIbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:31:05 -0500 Subject: Re: JFS default behavior From: Nicolas Mailhot To: Jan Knutar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200402160545.04175.jk-lkml@sci.fi> References: <1076886183.18571.14.camel@m222.net81-64-248.noos.fr> <200402160545.04175.jk-lkml@sci.fi> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gy3Ueg6OdOIEpGep9VC5" Organization: Adresse personnelle Message-Id: <1076920241.11055.4.camel@ulysse.olympe.o2t> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.3 (1.5.3-1) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:30:41 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-gy3Ueg6OdOIEpGep9VC5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le lun, 16/02/2004 =C3=A0 05:45 +0200, Jan Knutar a =C3=A9crit : > > - what happens to already existing invalid UTF-8 filenames ? Should > > the kernel forcibly rewrite them (in 2.7.0...) to remove legacy mess > > ? What should happen if someone plug an unconverted FS in such a > > system afterwards ? >=20 > What I would like would be a userspace tool, that would recurse and=20 > convert filename encodings from specified locale to UTF-8. Something=20 > like "any2utf8 -from iso8859-1 -recurse /mnt/myoldmp3disk".=20 > Does anyone know if such a tool exists already? One can do find+ recode magic now The question is : - can this be automated ? - how can one recognise and unconverted fs ? - how can on guess the encodings(s) that have been used before on such an fs ? You're assuming the situation is merely a iso8859-1 to utf-8 migration. Far from it. The core problem is everyone damn wrote what it pleased him without considering future readers. Cheers, --=20 Nicolas Mailhot --=-gy3Ueg6OdOIEpGep9VC5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAMH+pI2bVKDsp8g0RAu+5AKCrkjSjuS4obgLFnV/KWsHD/W1wOgCfTEl2 5p7EjazLOSHKAqjOzW55xmU= =S8t0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gy3Ueg6OdOIEpGep9VC5--