From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265477AbUBPKLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:11:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265478AbUBPKLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:11:16 -0500 Received: from websrv.werbeagentur-aufwind.de ([213.239.197.241]:2738 "EHLO mail.werbeagentur-aufwind.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265477AbUBPKLP (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:11:15 -0500 Subject: Re: dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) From: Christophe Saout To: David Wagner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <402A4B52.1080800@centrum.cz> <20040216014433.GA5430@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040215175337.5d7a06c9.akpm@osdl.org> <1076900296.5601.41.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1076926270.5228.17.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:11:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mo, den 16.02.2004 schrieb David Wagner um 08:28: > Probably I'm misunderstanding something, but: Do you really mean that > you are using ECB mode? How is that secure? (Everyone knows why ECB > mode should almost never be used, right?) Yes, it is how it sounds. It's only used if explicitly specified assuming the user knows what he's doing. It's mainly for backwards compatibility because cryptoloop can do the same (but it isn't used by default either).