From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267132AbUBSJl5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:41:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267099AbUBSJl5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:41:57 -0500 Received: from mail.daysofwonder.com ([209.61.173.130]:14525 "EHLO mail.daysofwonder.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267132AbUBSJld (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:41:33 -0500 Subject: Re: PROBLEM: spurious temporary freeze, scheduler and preempt problem ? From: Brice Figureau To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Eric , Nick Piggin In-Reply-To: <403402DE.4030400@cyberone.com.au> References: <1077117976.2265.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200402181212.06279.eric@cisu.net> <403402DE.4030400@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1077183691.2058.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4-8mdk Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:41:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric, Nick, On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 01:27, Nick Piggin wrote: > Eric wrote: > > >On Wednesday 18 February 2004 9:26 am, Brice Figureau wrote: > >Someone correct me if I'm way off base, but have you tried > > scheduler=deadline > >To try the different kernel schedulers? > >Im not sure about the keyword, but do a quick google or search lkml and you'll > >see the correct keyword and the different schedulers you can try. > > It's probably a CPU scheduler related problem, so this > wouldn't do much. Yes it is more a CPU scheduler problem, than an io one (although I tested with elevator=deadline just to be sure ;-) and I had the same problem). -- Brice Figureau