From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261215AbUBTN1r (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:27:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261224AbUBTNZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:25:25 -0500 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:37380 "EHLO kerberos.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261217AbUBTNUA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:20:00 -0500 Subject: Re: recommended "stable" compiler? From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Nick Bartos Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <58930.192.168.1.12.1077278393.squirrel@mail.2thebatcave.com> References: <58930.192.168.1.12.1077278393.squirrel@mail.2thebatcave.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1077283178.798.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:39 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 12:59, Nick Bartos wrote: > What is the recommended stable compiler for compiling the latest 2.4.x > kernel? I'm no kernel guru, but I have been compiling 2.5/2.6 kernels for a long time with gcc 3.3 with no problems at all. I had problems with gcc 3.2 in the past, miscompiling the ymfpci driver.