From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261246AbUCHVZu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:25:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261255AbUCHVZu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:25:50 -0500 Received: from 75.80-203-232.nextgentel.com ([80.203.232.75]:7142 "EHLO lincoln.jordet.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261246AbUCHVZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:25:49 -0500 Subject: Re: smbfs patch From: Stian Jordet To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Hansen Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1078438839.10042.6.camel@luke> References: <1078438839.10042.6.camel@luke> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <1078781118.4013.1.camel@buick.jordet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:25:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tor, 04.03.2004 kl. 23.20 skrev Søren Hansen: > I noticed that smbfs no longer respects the "uid" and "gid" mount > options passed to it by mount.(I think it stopped when the server was > upgraded to Samba 3.0. Not sure though, since my client was upgraded to > Linux 2.6.3 at around the same time). I've made this small patch that > fixes it (bear with me, this is my first patch to the kernel :-) ): I have the same problem as you have. I have not gotten around to test your patch yet (but will later tonight), but I read in another mail from you that you had discussed the patch with Urban Widmark. Is the any opinions against this patch? If not, will you try to submit it to Andrew/Linus? Anyway, thanks for the patch :) Best regards, Stian