From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@gmx.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
len.brown@intel.com, Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: ACPI PM Timer vs. C1 halt issue
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:49:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1078955372.2696.23.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404E4913.3020005@gmx.de>
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:45, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> john stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 13:35, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> >
> >>I found out what causes higher idle temps when using mm-sources and
> >>2.6.4-rc vanilla sources: If I use PM Timer as timesource, it seems the
> >>C1 halt isn't properly called, at least CPU disconnect doesn't seem to
> >>work, thus leaving my CPU as hot as without disconnect.
> [snip]
> >
> > Sounds like a bug. I'm not very familiar w/ the ACPI cpu power states,
> > is there anything you have to do to trigger C1 Halt? Or is it just
> > called in the idle loop?
>
> It should be called within the idle loop.
Hmm. I'm still stumped. Looking at acpi_processor_idle(), the C1 state
doesn't touch the ACPI PM timer. The C2 and C3 states do, but they just
read.
Dominik: Do you have a clue on this?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 21:35 Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-09 22:11 ` john stultz
2004-03-09 22:45 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 21:49 ` john stultz [this message]
2004-03-10 22:11 ` Len Brown
2004-03-10 22:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11 0:15 ` Thomas Schlichter
2004-03-11 8:47 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11 13:46 ` Thomas Schlichter
2004-03-11 14:23 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-10 22:53 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-11 18:14 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1078955372.2696.23.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=PrakashKC@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®