From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: trini@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/22] Add __early_param for all arches
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:29:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080210253.29835.37.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040324195502.00a5b148.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:55 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Please tell us a little more about why we need these patches. (Apart from
> what seems to be a moderate amount of code consolidation).
A lot of command line options need checking before we get out of
setup_arch() into start_kernel() where parse_cmdline() is currently
called.
In particular, the only thing stopping us from registering real
permanent consoles from the moment we hit setup_arch() is the fact that
we haven't yet handled 'console=' on the command line, and we end up
enabling the first console registered as if there's no console=
argument, _despite_ the fact that there _is_ such an argument.
> Also, what is different between __setup and __early_setup? Why is it not
> possible to make __setup run sufficiently early for whatever application is
> requiring these changes?
Drivers may require allocation (bootmem not slab). We want to run before
that's feasible -- before 'mem=', by definition :)
There _are_ a lot of patches but most of them are trivial and were
separated just for cleanliness. Where they're non-trivial that's because
there's real consolidation.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-26 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-24 23:57 trini
2004-03-25 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-26 11:29 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2004-03-26 21:03 ` Russell King
2004-03-26 21:15 ` David Woodhouse
2004-03-31 4:23 ` Rusty Russell
2004-03-31 16:13 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-01 1:51 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-01 2:24 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-01 2:56 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080210253.29835.37.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®