From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT3/JBD] Periodic journal flush not enough?
Date: 29 Mar 2004 19:56:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080586577.2285.107.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040326154851.7a3ad417.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 23:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > I've encountered a problem with the journal flush timer. The problem
> > is that when a filesystem is short on space, relying on a timer-based
> > flushing mechanism is no longer adequate. For example, on my P4 2GHz
> > I can trigger an ENOSPC error by doing
> >
> > while :; do echo test > a; [ -s a ] || break; rm a; done; echo Out of space
> >
> > on an ext3 file system with 12Mb of free space using the usual 5s
> > journal flush timer.
>
> I cannot reproduce this. Please send more details. Journalling mode,
> kernel version, etc.
Sounds like it's due to the "b_committed_data" avoidance code. Ext3
cannot immediately reuse disk space after a delete, because of lazy
writeback --- until the final writeback of the delete hits disk, we have
to be able to undo it. And because in non-data-journaled modes we allow
new disk writes to hit disk before a transaction commit, that means we
can't reuse deleted blocks until after they are committed.
I've never seen it reported as a problem outside of artificial test
scenarios, but if it is something we need to address, Andreas Dilger's
patch looks good.
Cheers,
Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-29 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-26 23:19 Herbert Xu
2004-03-26 23:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-27 0:01 ` Herbert Xu
2004-03-29 18:56 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2004-03-29 19:16 ` Chris Mason
2004-03-26 23:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-03-29 20:03 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080586577.2285.107.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®