From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264212AbUEMOHT (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 10:07:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264213AbUEMOHS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 10:07:18 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:7179 "EHLO kerberos.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264212AbUEMOFz (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2004 10:05:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] AES i586 optimized From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Fruhwirth Clemens Cc: Andrew Morton , Kernel Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <20040513114250.GB22233@ghanima.endorphin.org> References: <20040513110110.GA8491@ghanima.endorphin.org> <20040513040732.75c5999c.akpm@osdl.org> <20040513114250.GB22233@ghanima.endorphin.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1084457158.1737.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-1) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:05:59 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 13:42, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote: > > > > Some benchmark figures would be useful. Cache-cold and cache-hot. > > I posted this patch for the first time about 3/4 year ago. The first > response has been the same. Please have a look at I'll give this a spin, since I'm very interested in AES. Currently, I'm using IPSec with AES ESP all over my 100Mbps LAN. I'll apply this one to 2.6.6-mm2 and will compare with vanillas 2.6.6 and 2.6.6-mm2.