mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: FabF <Fabian.Frederick@skynet.be>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.6-mm4-ff1] I/O context isolation
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:46:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085125564.8071.23.camel@bluerhyme.real3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40ADB20C.8090204@yahoo.com.au>

On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 09:38, Nick Piggin wrote:
> FabF wrote:
> > Jens,
> > 
> > 	Here's ff1 patchset to have generic I/O context.
> > ff1 : Export io context operations from blkdev/ll_rw_blk (ok)
> > ff2 : Make io_context generic plateform by importing IO stuff from
> > as_io.
> > 
> 
> Can I just ask why you want as_io_context in generic code?
> It is currently nicely hidden away in as-iosched.c where
> nobody else needs to ever see it.
I do want I/O context to be generic not the whole as_io.
That export should bring:
	-All elevators to use io_context
	-source tree to be more self-explanatory
	-have a stronger elevator interface

> 
> > 	AFAICS, cfq_queue for instance could disappear when using io_context
> > but I think elv_data should remain elevator side....
> > I don't want to go in the wild here so if you've got suggestions, don't
> > hesitate ;)
> > 
> 
> cfq_queue is per-queue-per-process. io_context is just
> per-process, so it isn't a trivial replacement.
But I guess we can merge that stuff to have "a one way, one place" code
rather than repeat code in all elv.

Regards,
FabF


  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-21  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-21  7:24 FabF
2004-05-21  7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21  7:46   ` FabF [this message]
2004-05-21  7:53     ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-21  8:18       ` FabF
2004-05-21  7:57     ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21  8:05       ` FabF
2004-05-21  8:11       ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-21  7:51   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1085125564.8071.23.camel@bluerhyme.real3 \
    --to=fabian.frederick@skynet.be \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®