From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264537AbUEaFU7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 01:20:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264531AbUEaFU7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 01:20:59 -0400 Received: from mail.gurulabs.com ([66.62.77.7]:18583 "EHLO mail.gurulabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264537AbUEaFU6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 01:20:58 -0400 Subject: Re: Why is proper NTFS-driver difficult? From: Dax Kelson To: Martin Olsson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <40BA1FD5.9080902@minimum.se> References: <40BA1FD5.9080902@minimum.se> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1085980819.12504.3.camel@mentor.gurulabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7 (1.5.7-2) Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 23:20:20 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 19:54 +0200, Martin Olsson wrote: > Hello, > > > I was wondering why is there no Linux NTFS-driver which allows full > writing etc? Is there something that makes this particular difficult to > implement? I mean Linux supports so many file systems, why has proper > NTFS support been neglected? > > Is there any file system I can use which satisfies these criteria: > A) works in both Linux and Windows > B) handle >4GB files > C) handle 120GB partitions UDF meets A & B. I don't if it meets C. Dax