mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Mohan Yelugoti <ymd@arista.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] ACPI: threaded SCI handler causes soft lockup in kdump capture kernel
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 19:17:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10861813.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ah3rlJrHviZHFt0+@vm-ymd.sjc.aristanetworks.com>

On Monday, June 1, 2026 10:29:08 PM CEST Mohan Yelugoti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We ship SONiC[0] on top of Debian stable with a small set of patches
> on top (see [1]). After moving SONiC from Debian bookworm
> to trixie, we started seeing a regression where the kdump capture
> kernel hits a soft lockup while collecting the crash dump, so no
> vmcore is produced.
> 
> We trigger the original panic in the kernel with:
> 
>       echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> 
> The capture kernel then boots and hangs. To capture a usable trace
> rather than waiting indefinitely, I added the following to the
> capture-kernel command line so that it panics on soft lockup (and
> dumps backtraces from all CPUs) when the hang is detected:
> 
>       debug=1 loglevel=7 softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=1 softlockup_panic=1
> 
> With those in place, the capture kernel prints:
> 
>       watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [irq/9-acpi:39]
>       CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 39 Comm: irq/9-acpi Not tainted
>         6.12.41+deb13-sonic-amd64 #1 Debian 6.12.41-1
>       RIP: 0010:acpi_os_read_port+0x30/0xa0

I have no idea what possibly may lock up in that function, sorry.

In this particular case it is reading a byte from the I/O space via inb(),
that's all.

I'm wondering if it gets interrupted for some reason and then something
odd happens that prevents it from continuing.

>       Call Trace:
>        <TASK>
>        acpi_hw_gpe_read+0x61/0x80
>        acpi_ev_detect_gpe+0x74/0x180
>        acpi_ev_gpe_detect+0xe1/0x130
>        acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0x1d/0x40
>        acpi_irq+0x1c/0x40
>        irq_thread_fn+0x23/0x60
>        irq_thread+0x1b3/0x2f0
>        kthread+0xd2/0x100
>        ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
>        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>        </TASK>
>       Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
> 
> Between the bookworm and trixie kernels, the ACPI SCI handler was
> moved from a hardirq handler to a threaded handler by:
> 
>     7a36b901a6eb ("ACPI: OSL: Use a threaded interrupt handler for SCI")

Maybe it exposed some latent issue.

It's too late to revert it from the mainline anyway.

> To confirm this is the trigger, I reverted that commit on top of
> 6.12.41 and re-ran the same sysrq-trigger reproducer. The capture
> kernel then completes the crash dump without tripping the soft
> lockup watchdog.
> 
> Happy to test patches or gather more data as this is reproducible
> consistently on our systems.

Does it always occur at the same spot?  If so, you could try to
instrument the code around it and look for clues.

> This issue has been raised in the SONiC project at [2].
> 
>   Context
>   -------
> - Kernel:        6.12.41+deb13-sonic-amd64 (Debian 6.12.41-1);
> - Last known good: Debian bookworm kernel (6.1.123), predates
>                      7a36b901a6eb.
> 
> - Default capture-kernel cmdline (from /etc/default/kdump-tools,
>   KDUMP_CMDLINE_APPEND):
> 
>       irqpoll nr_cpus=1 nousb systemd.unit=kdump-tools.service
>       ata_piix.prefer_ms_hyperv=0 panic=10 debug loglevel=4
>       hpet=disable pcie_port=compat pci=nommconf
> 
> For the trace above, loglevel was raised from 4 to 7 and the
> following were added:
> 
>      debug=1 softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=1 softlockup_panic=1
> 
> [0]: https://github.com/sonic-net
> [1]: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel/tree/master/patches-sonic
> [2]: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-linux-kernel/pull/580
> 
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 20:29 Mohan Yelugoti
2026-06-02 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-06-02 17:20   ` Mario Limonciello
2026-06-02 17:26     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10861813.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ymd@arista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®