From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: joe.korty@ccur.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ronny.Lampert@telecasystems.de,
ioe-lkml@rameria.de
Subject: Re: [BUG] NFS no longer updates file modification times appropriately
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:01:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1086627686.4597.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1086627207.4597.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
På må , 07/06/2004 klokka 12:53, skreiv Trond Myklebust:
> >
> > Compatibility with existing behavior. It's called a de-facto standard.
>
> The "de-facto standard" you describe has never existed other than for
> large files. It was never true of small files that did not trigger
> immediate writeout.
...in fact even for files that trigger immediate writeout, the behaviour
was erratic, since writes could still be cached after the
memory-triggered flush was completed.
So I repeat: There has *never* been a standard other than the
close-to-open.
There has *never* existed any reliable mtime/ctime while the client was
caching writes.
If you want that sort of behaviour, the options are O_SYNC, fsync(),
close(), or "mount -osync". There is no call for it in async writes.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-03 20:28 Joe Korty
2004-06-03 21:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-04 3:25 ` Ingo Oeser
2004-06-06 19:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-04 13:23 ` Joe Korty
2004-06-04 23:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-04 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-04 23:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-07 15:21 ` Joe Korty
2004-06-07 15:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-07 16:13 ` Joe Korty
2004-06-07 16:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-07 16:39 ` Joe Korty
2004-06-07 16:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-06-07 17:01 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1086627686.4597.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=Ronny.Lampert@telecasystems.de \
--cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®