From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4009C433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8484360F9E for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229985AbhJTJWL (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:22:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:52304 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229702AbhJTJWK (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:22:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634721596; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OHr8I1ADCNyh3IkqXu+kSFGMzNh00bfIZFxOebGZQ0I=; b=FtZJ3zLN1OSA49q8dV0he8svyEzuJ+vKXkCCooOmTZuyBg0HuApU/5/ottspFCVUVQkO5m XMx52ujXoKjXzsex4OChSx5ZvUQp+WTZMJ3gS8rzew4fy1JGfdmLcLlnggtW2hLAm3/b75 cQGVRFBbQAfLrA/C9T1/D/cZbVNj3ZI= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-181-I2GTK6rbMQar0Uf2RJ50uQ-1; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:19:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: I2GTK6rbMQar0Uf2RJ50uQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id a20-20020a1c9814000000b0032311c7fc54so1817868wme.1 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:19:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHr8I1ADCNyh3IkqXu+kSFGMzNh00bfIZFxOebGZQ0I=; b=h3/o6SGgiGCCFc552rfWCfPIbTWGpYAu3QjeC+usd+eUG3/mzxi826Eswkiuh6IBgW fFpABr/M6qLALr1RDNWrpYbXoZXv+dP5T4nX2jQc+gcjrJoiy0Lu6jV6YRt72bEt18kX 3mHwxGoxOeoIlTPa+ZJTltr1LQO9tH1jcA/M2nh44YqMQWTZ/ioxcSakMAk1zA4QCYEp bJTNf6uyrTV6J9b3n7xbrRK442U4hJQbQX5y/zufQZFKkRkKLxmbcswxgNl0apzosh1/ AMTKa3ClGPqtiIQYivjBNQkVjFmX+MlmPDGZSfjMTnfoeI3awcGxmq4RxBwX8iQB2ORg tW8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rsx+llVTDgKh8AMxE4YQLF8maay+99xkkmJeVIbX9xBwkKMhF +HYA35P0rm/Ry0E7AcV8F/0KFlrPyvdnjA227xWXrN/Pr8slUBXSumILp0jTx8BkiU+41WibGFl e4KgTs7NnqVQfxKJnFeoduF+I X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c2:: with SMTP id g2mr6607226wmk.195.1634721593625; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:19:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiiYUod6TjDrGOf5rSFm4jDSLEbRAQsvLs/anVGCjrige706yEvHKXxis2/c7BWvlw2Ap7NQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c2:: with SMTP id g2mr6607205wmk.195.1634721593406; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm1575475wmq.4.2021.10.20.02.19.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 02:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1088c582-8afe-e5f2-8db8-0f0b05a5f7d3@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:19:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling Content-Language: en-US To: "Bae, Chang Seok" , Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "x86@kernel.org" , "Liu, Jing2" , Dave Hansen , Arjan van de Ven , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Nakajima, Jun" , Sean Christopherson References: <20211017151447.829495362@linutronix.de> <841ACA86-CE97-4707-BF6E-AC932F1E056D@intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <841ACA86-CE97-4707-BF6E-AC932F1E056D@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/10/21 21:43, Bae, Chang Seok wrote: > On Oct 17, 2021, at 10:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> The latter builds, boots and runs KVM guests, but that reallocation >> functionality is obviously completely untested. > > Compiled and booted on bare-metal and KVM (guest with the same kernel). > No dmesg regression. No selftest regression. > > Tested-by Chang S. Bae Same here. Thanks, Chang Seok! Paolo