From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267538AbUGWEjp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:39:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267540AbUGWEjp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:39:45 -0400 Received: from mail.timesys.com ([65.117.135.102]:14879 "EHLO exchange.timesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267538AbUGWEjn (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:39:43 -0400 Subject: Re: case-sensitive file names during build From: Pragnesh Sampat To: dank@kegel.com Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, hollisb@us.ibm.com, christopher.faylor@timesys.com, "Povolotsky, Alexander" , crossgcc , "linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org" , Andrew Morton , bert hubert , Linux Kernel list , sam.robb@timesys.com In-Reply-To: <1090538760.8683.57.camel@pss-pc.timesys> References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1D036EDF21@exchange.timesys.com> <1090524458.8679.23.camel@pss-pc.timesys> <20040722221106.GD7073@mars.ravnborg.org> <1090538760.8683.57.camel@pss-pc.timesys> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090557434.3309.33.camel@dagoban.sampatonline.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:38:21 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2004 04:39:41.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[11D2E090:01C4706F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 19:26, Pragnesh Sampat wrote: > OK, here they are. I applied them against 2.6.6 and can regen them if > needed against current -mm. Also note that If you are using 2.6 > versions earlier than 2.6.4, you will probably need 2-3 patches more. > (These were generated by various people here at TimeSys and modified for > different versions.) > OK, I kept thinking there was more to it ... I am not sure if loadkeys program is always needed or not (depends on CONFIG), but I remember seeing a binary loadkeys was used, so that may be an issue. I am not sure if newer versions of cygwin come with loadkeys or how easy it is to build one for cygwin. The other thing I remember was a missing elf.h file on cygwin. I think with - loadkeys (not a kernel patch) - missing elf.h (IIRC) (not a kernel patch) - kconfig shared library patch (from Dan's link) - and the patches sent earlier some platforms should see a full build (for >= 2.6.4). Sometimes there are problems in arch//Makefile that you will see only if you build for a particular board/platform, so there will always be a few lurking. >>From what I can tell, these seem to fall under types or simple Makefile fixes, so might be easy to spot. I can't easily do any testing for the next few days since I don't have a setup right now, but might be able to sometime next week. -Pragnesh