From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266133AbUGZWgc (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:36:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266120AbUGZWgc (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:36:32 -0400 Received: from dh132.citi.umich.edu ([141.211.133.132]:18074 "EHLO lade.trondhjem.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266133AbUGZWfb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:35:31 -0400 Subject: Re: bug with multiple mounts of filesystems in 2.6 From: Trond Myklebust To: Mike Waychison Cc: John S J Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Herbert Poetzl In-Reply-To: <41057893.1030006@sun.com> References: <86oem2hgv8.fsf@mendel.genehack.org> <1090870651.6809.62.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <41057893.1030006@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <1090881327.6809.111.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:35:27 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org På må , 26/07/2004 klokka 17:33, skreiv Mike Waychison: > How is this any different than having two seperate nfs clients accessing > the same nfs export? It isn't, but why do you think that should be a reason for allowing it? By all means feel free to add "mount --bind -oro" capabilities, but it is neither useful nor is it necessary to break the NFS caching model in order to do so. Cheers, Trond