From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:12:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1091175161.1844.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091140772.2703.38.camel@desktop.cunninghams>
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:39 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 02:10, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > Okay. So, just to make sure I understand you correctly, suspending works
> > > fine with all of these other patches added and adding the extra
> > > refrigerator calls breaks it. Are you at all able to narrow it down to a
> > > particular change?
> >
> > Exactly! I'm currently running a highly patched kernel based on 2.6.8-
> > rc2-bk7 plus Con's work and Ingo's voluntary preempt. They work fine
> > when suspending to memory (S3) and to disk (S4 via swsusp), but adding
> > your kthread freezer flags to the mix keeps my CardBus NIC from being
> > recognized when resuming from S3: I need to unplug it, then plug it to
> > make it functional again.
> >
> > However, I'm not sure what causes this behavior.
>
> Could you please try reversing each of the changes in my patch until it
> starts working? The NFS ones could be done all at once - they should be
> irrelevant to you anyway IIRC.
That's what I'm doing right now ;-)
Please, give me a few hours to post the result.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-30 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 7:22 Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-28 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:30 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-28 22:27 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 23:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 10:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 12:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 16:10 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 22:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 8:12 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2004-07-29 22:57 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 23:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 19:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:24 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 23:25 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags (Version 2) Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 9:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 16:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-30 12:11 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags Peter Osterlund
2004-07-30 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1091175161.1844.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®