On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 14:54, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 14:32, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  config W1
> > > >  	tristate "Dallas's 1-wire support"
> > > > +	select NET
> > > 
> > > What's wrong with a simple dependency?
> > 
> > W1 requires NET, and thus depends on it.
> > If you _do_ want W1 then you _do_ need network and then NET must be
> > selected.
> 
> A simple "depends on NET" does this as well, I see no reason to abuse 
> select.

I think it does it in reverse order:
if we have NET then we _may_ select W1, but if we _need_ W1 and do not
know upon what it depends?

> bye, Roman
-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov ( s0mbre )

Crash is better than data corruption. -- Art Grabowski