From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
haveblue@us.ibm.com,
acpi-devel <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:55:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093028151.4993.42.camel@tdi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2550950000.1092019997@[10.10.2.4]>
I'm not sure where we stand on this, sorry for the delay. To recap,
the first patch I submitted cleaned up the original functions, but moved
the ugliness up into multi-line macros. People didn't like the macros
and suggested static inlines. However, static inlines don't work for
this application because the debug print needs state setup by the
ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME call. IMHO, it's not worth setting up that state in
the static inline function for this little bit of cleanup.
So, I think we left it at nobody liked the macros and static inlines
don't work. General unhappiness. Below is a patch that doesn't attempt
to cleanup the original code, it just adds the #ifdefs and range
checking w/ no macros. Does this look better? Below is the original
submit comment outlining the goal. Thanks,
Alex
The patch below removes these warnings:
CC drivers/acpi/numa.o
drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_table_print_srat_entry':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:55: warning: unused variable `p'
drivers/acpi/numa.c:65: warning: unused variable `p'
drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_numa_init':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:179: warning: passing arg 2 of
`acpi_table_parse_srat' from incompatible pointer type
drivers/acpi/numa.c:182: warning: passing arg 2 of
`acpi_table_parse_srat' from incompatible pointer type
And propagates the MADT error checking code into the SRAT code.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
===== drivers/acpi/numa.c 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/drivers/acpi/numa.c 2004-02-18 02:19:31 -07:00
+++ edited/drivers/acpi/numa.c 2004-08-10 16:58:37 -06:00
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
switch (header->type) {
case ACPI_SRAT_PROCESSOR_AFFINITY:
+#ifdef ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
{
struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *p =
(struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
@@ -58,9 +59,11 @@
p->apic_id, p->lsapic_eid, p->proximity_domain,
p->flags.enabled?"enabled":"disabled"));
}
+#endif
break;
case ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY_AFFINITY:
+#ifdef ACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
{
struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *p =
(struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
@@ -70,6 +73,7 @@
p->flags.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled",
p->flags.hot_pluggable ? " hot-pluggable" : ""));
}
+#endif
break;
default:
@@ -103,12 +107,14 @@
static int __init
-acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_processor_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
{
struct acpi_table_processor_affinity *processor_affinity;
processor_affinity = (struct acpi_table_processor_affinity*) header;
- if (!processor_affinity)
+ if (!processor_affinity || (unsigned long)processor_affinity +
+ sizeof(*processor_affinity) > size ||
+ header->length != sizeof(*processor_affinity))
return -EINVAL;
acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
@@ -121,12 +127,14 @@
static int __init
-acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header)
+acpi_parse_memory_affinity (acpi_table_entry_header *header, unsigned long size)
{
struct acpi_table_memory_affinity *memory_affinity;
memory_affinity = (struct acpi_table_memory_affinity*) header;
- if (!memory_affinity)
+ if (!memory_affinity || (unsigned long)memory_affinity +
+ sizeof(*memory_affinity) > size ||
+ header->length != sizeof(*memory_affinity))
return -EINVAL;
acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-20 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 20:46 Alex Williamson
2004-08-05 21:01 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-05 21:25 ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-06 3:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 3:50 ` [ACPI] " Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-07 17:57 ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-08 21:36 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-09 2:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-20 18:55 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2004-08-20 19:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-09 4:19 ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-09 4:52 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-09 5:10 ` Alex Williamson
2004-08-09 5:44 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093028151.4993.42.camel@tdi \
--to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome