From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264857AbUHWGcb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 02:32:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267443AbUHWGcb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 02:32:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:8916 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264857AbUHWGc3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 02:32:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000 - Use vmalloc for data structures not shared From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com In-Reply-To: <200408222225.i7MMPRNX019306@hera.kernel.org> References: <200408222225.i7MMPRNX019306@hera.kernel.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Ham3SKUJ8ZBxxPJKhoig" Organization: Red Hat UK Message-Id: <1093242724.2792.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:32:04 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-Ham3SKUJ8ZBxxPJKhoig Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 18:01, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.1807.39.3, 2004/07/29 12:01:46-04:00, ganesh.venkatesan@intel= .com >=20 > [PATCH] e1000 - Use vmalloc for data structures not shared eh why? You are aware that vmalloc'd datastructures are slower during use (due to TLB overhead) right ? These structures also don't look THAT big on first sight.... --=-Ham3SKUJ8ZBxxPJKhoig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBKY9kxULwo51rQBIRAsxlAJsE2NnABHWAki6surdKuteyzhFAgQCeOisx jYvQ+u1QezKsKvsJwXfGuJE= =86Fg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Ham3SKUJ8ZBxxPJKhoig--