From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758345AbZEEVAc (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 17:00:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754690AbZEEVAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 17:00:20 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:33347 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754637AbZEEVAT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 17:00:19 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 May 2009 08:35:27 PDT." <20090505153527.GA6890@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20090504153815.GB6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504155505.GA8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504161024.GC6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504162252.GB8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504221208.GB29402@kroah.com> <20090505020149.GE8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090505021121.GA6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090505021853.GF8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090505033442.GB6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <74785.1241510758@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20090505153527.GA6890@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1241557208_96868P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 17:00:08 -0400 Message-ID: <109333.1241557208@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1241557208_96868P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 05 May 2009 08:35:27 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said: > http://books.google.com/books?id=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=PT822&lpg=PT822&dq=Videotron ics+v.+Bend+Electronics,+586+F.Supp.+478,+481+(D.+Nev.+1984)&source=bl&ots=ccxO 5np_uQ&sig=Q0wj4k5uCpMiZybAQe12JlHhh0A&hl=en&ei=Z1kASu2ZJ8eLtgehupyNBw&sa=X&oi= book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPT822,M1 > > Dated 2005, cites a 1988 case in footnote 28. Also claims that: That would be the same Neundorfer case I found. > Copyright Office II Compendium of Copyright Office Practices lists > acceptable variants to the C in a circle, including "(c)". http://www.copyright.gov/compendium/ - I ain't seeing it in there anyplace? Every occurrence of "(c)" is in either a USC or CFR citation. But of course that only shows the two chapters modified since 1998. Yee-hah. :) I suspect it's one of those dark corners of the legal system that nobody really wants to explore, because there might be a Balrog hiding in the depths (sort of like the question "Which clause/theory of copyright law authorizes the copy of a webpage you make while downloading it to read it?" ;) --==_Exmh_1241557208_96868P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFKAKjYcC3lWbTT17ARAkAUAJ4lSgDE6lA29wIG7sOdYBPZm3pBQwCgp0y8 ItLZHq9sv+ICoIad7JNamu8= =Hn1y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1241557208_96868P--