From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266293AbUHaCkJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:40:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266296AbUHaCkJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:40:09 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.42]:47262 "EHLO ms-smtp-03-eri0.texas.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266293AbUHaCkG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:40:06 -0400 Subject: MAX_NESTED_LINKS From: Steve French To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1093920028.2445.2.camel@smfhome.smfdom> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:40:28 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MAX_NESTED_LINKS seems to have been set to 5, but the comment in fs/namei.c indicates a larger number. Is that intentional? * This limits recursive symlink follows to 8, while * limiting consecutive symlinks to 40. @@ -405,19 +407,30 @@ static inline int do_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) { int err = -ELOOP; if (current->link_count >= MAX_NESTED_LINKS) goto loop; if (current->total_link_count >= 40) goto loop; BUG_ON(nd->depth >= MAX_NESTED_LINKS);