From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268515AbUHaWnq (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:43:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268996AbUHaWlE (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:41:04 -0400 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:15550 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268165AbUHaWJX (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:09:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: greg@kroah.com, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040831151029.449770ec.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1093988576.4815.43.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20040831150015.2e0e0906.akpm@osdl.org> <1093989601.4815.48.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20040831151029.449770ec.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:08:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1093990133.4815.59.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.94 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 15:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > That's unrelated. I meant: Not unrelated - if it were not the case, I'd see your point. But, ugh, add another level of redirection to save the duplication of three lines? Robert Love