From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268214AbUIBLiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:38:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268239AbUIBLiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:38:07 -0400 Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr ([213.228.0.176]:38793 "EHLO postfix4-2.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268214AbUIBLiE (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:38:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1094125083.4137061b54913@imp1-q.free.fr> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:38:03 +0200 From: castet.matthieu@free.fr To: Len Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pnp and acpi_pnp References: <566B962EB122634D86E6EE29E83DD808182C46FD@hdsmsx403.hd.intel.com> <1094005570.3943.55.camel@linux> In-Reply-To: <1094005570.3943.55.camel@linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 62.147.113.144 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Selon Len Brown : > Matthieu, > PNPBIOS should be disabled when ACPI is enabled, and it is a bug that > this is not automatic. > > yes, the "Linux PNP" layer is incomplete, and ACPI isn't yet plugged > into that. > > cheers, > -Len > > > Hi, thanks for your reply. What about the fact that acpi pnp don't make the difference between a normal serial port and a ir port ? I hope acpi will be plugged soon in Linux PNP layer. regards, Matthieu