From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S265195AbUIOM2Z@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265195AbUIOM2Z (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:28:25 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265230AbUIOM2Z
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:28:25 -0400
Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:32961 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S265195AbUIOM2Y (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:28:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC, 2.6] a simple FIFO implementation
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040915102003.GA21917@sd291.sivit.org>
References: <20040913135253.GA3118@crusoe.alcove-fr>
	 <20040915102003.GA21917@sd291.sivit.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1095247481.19893.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:25:03 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mer, 2004-09-15 at 11:20, Stelian Pop wrote:
> > An initial implementation follows below. Comments ?
> 
> Two days later, I've got no comments at all.
> 
> Is this because the idea or the implementation are just stupid ?

I certainly made no comment because it seemed completely correct and
needed no comment. If your drivers are using it I'd like to see it just
get merged