mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	gamin-list@gnome.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	iggy@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:03:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096409017.4911.95.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096408235.5177.49.camel@issola.madrabbit.org>

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 14:50 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:

> I'm afraid I'm not seeing the complexity argument. Do you have other
> concerns regarding dynamic lengths?

You _do_ see the complexity, you just don't that think it matters.

It forces more complexity on user-space (as least as much as you have
shown) and even more in the kernel (due partly to the current very
simple event code in place that needs the buffer to be a multiple of the
struct size, etc.).

Personally, I don't know if it matters.  John and I have both said that
we will look into going to a dynamic filename.

Also, I am sure that John will take a patch, if you are so inclined.

	Robert Love



  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-28 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-27  2:02 John McCutchan
2004-09-27  4:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-27 20:52   ` Robert Love
2004-09-28  4:41     ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-28  2:14       ` Robert Love
2004-09-28  3:44         ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 17:31           ` Robert Love
2004-09-28  5:45     ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 19:08       ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-28 16:41         ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-28 16:53           ` Robert Love
2004-09-28 17:32             ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 20:34               ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 21:20                 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-30  4:15                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-30  1:32                   ` John McCutchan
2004-09-30  1:34                   ` Robert Love
2004-09-30  3:05                     ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-30  5:37                       ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-30 12:43                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-30 15:29                       ` Ray Lee
2004-09-30 16:27                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-30 16:53                           ` Ray Lee
2004-09-30 17:48                             ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-01  1:22                               ` Ray Lee
2004-10-01  4:09                                 ` Paul Jackson
2004-10-04 20:58                                   ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 20:40         ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 20:47           ` Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:39             ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 22:10               ` Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:32           ` Ray Lee
2004-09-30  4:31           ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-28 20:26       ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 21:10         ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 21:20           ` Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:21           ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 21:35             ` Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:50               ` Ray Lee
2004-09-28 22:03                 ` Robert Love [this message]
2004-09-27 16:21 ` [gamin] [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 [u] Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-09-27 16:24   ` Robert Love
2004-09-27 16:30     ` Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-09-27 16:35       ` Robert Love
2004-09-27 17:10         ` Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-09-27 16:25 ` Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-09-27 17:12 ` [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 Robert Love
2004-09-27 19:48   ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-27 20:22     ` patch] inotify: use bitmap.h functions Robert Love
2004-09-27 20:38       ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-27 19:51 ` [patch] inotify: make it configurable Robert Love
2004-09-27 19:53 ` [patch] inotify: doh Robert Love
2004-09-27 20:06 ` [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 Robert Love
2004-09-27 20:39 ` [patch] inotify: don't check private_data Robert Love
2004-09-28  1:05 ` [patch] inotify: silly fix Robert Love
2004-09-28 17:38 ` [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 Mike Waychison
2004-09-28 20:35   ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 17:48 ` [patch] inotify: remove timer Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:46 ` [patch] inotify: use the idr layer Robert Love
2004-09-28 21:58   ` John McCutchan
2004-09-28 22:08     ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1096409017.4911.95.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com \
    --to=rml@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=gamin-list@gnome.org \
    --cc=iggy@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=ttb@tentacle.dhs.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®