mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] TTY flip buffer SMP changes
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 08:35:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097242506.2008.30.camel@deimos.microgate.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041008062650.GC2745@thunk.org>

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 01:26, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Even if kmalloc() isn't as fast using two ring buffers which we flip
> back and forth, CPU's have gotten a lot faster since when I
> implemented the flip buffers some 12 years ago (i.e., 8 Moore law's
> doublings ago).

The sk_buff solution does look attractive,
particularly for high data rates.

It does seem to carry serious overhead (in relation
to ring buffers) for devices with small FIFOs.

At 115200bps, I saw the 16550 driver accumulate
~8 bytes per interrupt. Using 2 sk_buffs per interrupt
means 256 sk_buff allocations to push 1KiB (71ms) of data
to the line discipline. This amounts to ~3600 sk_buff
allocations per second at 115200bps.

-- 
Paul Fulghum
paulkf@microgate.com


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-08 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-07 19:58 Paul Fulghum
2004-10-07 19:37 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-08  6:26   ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-10-08 13:35     ` Paul Fulghum [this message]
2004-10-08 12:51       ` Alan Cox
2004-10-08 15:00         ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-10-09  1:42           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-10  0:32             ` Alan Cox
2004-10-10  3:26               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-10 12:49                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1097242506.2008.30.camel@deimos.microgate.com \
    --to=paulkf@microgate.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome