From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Hacksaw <hacksaw@hacksaw.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev: what's up with old /dev ?
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:25:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097450746l.5993l.0l@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410102315.i9ANF7OI019460@hacksaw.org> (from hacksaw@hacksaw.org on Mon Oct 11 01:15:07 2004)
On 2004.10.11, Hacksaw wrote:
> >The very first thing init does is open /dev/console, and if it doesn't
> >exist the entire boot hangs.
>
> This raises a question: Would it be a useful thing to make a modified init
> that could run udev before it does anything else?
I don't think it is needed. There is no problem (i am thinking on rootles
nodes and PXE and so on...) on building a simple initrd with /dev/console,
/dev/null and half a dozen standard devices if they are needed. Just
to get udev run and have your real devices mounted there and overwrite
them.
I just remember one other oddity. To clean up my system, I copied the
running /dev to /dev-new, moved /dev to /dev-old and /dev-new to /dev.
But on 'reboot', I got a complaint about /dev/initctl not opening.
This could happen also with init. It opens real /dev/initctl on boot,
mounts /dev and tries to use new /dev/inittclt on shutdown...
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Community) for i586
Linux 2.6.9-rc3-mm3 (gcc 3.4.1 (Mandrakelinux 10.1 3.4.1-4mdk)) #2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-10 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-10 22:08 J.A. Magallon
2004-10-10 22:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-10 23:15 ` Hacksaw
2004-10-10 23:25 ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2004-10-11 0:06 ` Hacksaw
2004-10-11 19:13 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-10-11 9:14 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-10-11 10:29 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2004-10-11 12:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-10-11 11:11 ` Hacksaw
2004-10-11 12:04 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-10-11 20:06 ` Hacksaw
2004-10-11 20:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-10-11 21:28 ` Hacksaw
2004-10-12 0:19 ` Greg KH
2004-10-12 8:11 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-10-12 16:58 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <416C26B4.6040408@t-online.de>
[not found] ` <20041012185733.GA31222@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <416C3BB6.4040200@t-online.de>
[not found] ` <20041012203022.GB32139@kroah.com>
2004-10-12 21:35 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-10-13 13:08 ` Mathieu Segaud
2004-10-13 14:13 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-10-13 14:33 ` Mathieu Segaud
2004-10-10 22:41 Michael Thonke
2004-10-11 7:19 Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097450746l.5993l.0l@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=hacksaw@hacksaw.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome