From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Jerome Borsboom <j.borsboom@erasmusmc.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, george@mvista.com
Subject: Re: process start time set wrongly at boot for kernel 2.6.9
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:11:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098216701.20778.78.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410192015420.6471@knorkaan.xs4all.nl>
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:21, Jerome Borsboom wrote:
> Starting with kernel 2.6.9 the process start time is set wrongly for
> processes that get started early in the boot process. Below is a dump from
> my 'ps' command. Note the start time for processes 1-12. After process 12
> the start time is set right.
How reproducible is this? Are the correct and incorrect time values
always off by the same amount?
Are you running NTP? I'm curious if you are changing your system time
during boot.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-19 18:21 Jerome Borsboom
2004-10-19 20:11 ` john stultz [this message]
2004-10-20 0:42 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-10-20 0:59 ` john stultz
2004-10-20 3:05 ` gradual timeofday overhaul Tim Schmielau
2004-10-20 7:47 ` Len Brown
2004-10-20 15:09 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-20 15:59 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-10-20 15:17 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-20 17:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 21:42 ` Len Brown
2004-10-20 18:13 ` john stultz
2004-10-20 14:51 ` process start time set wrongly at boot for kernel 2.6.9 George Anzinger
2004-10-20 17:42 ` john stultz
2004-10-20 23:52 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-21 0:25 ` john stultz
2004-10-21 1:04 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-27 7:55 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-10-19 21:03 Jerome Borsboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098216701.20778.78.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=j.borsboom@erasmusmc.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®