From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262426AbUJ0NGt (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:06:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262429AbUJ0NEu (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:04:50 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:40712 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262426AbUJ0NB4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:01:56 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.28-rc1, more lost patches [6/10] From: Arjan van de Ven To: "O.Sezer" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com In-Reply-To: <417F98E1.4050309@ttnet.net.tr> References: <20041027094036.KAGS6935.fep01.ttnet.net.tr@localhost> <1098871777.4680.15.camel@laptop.fenrus.org> <417F98E1.4050309@ttnet.net.tr> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098882108.6990.7.camel@laptop.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2.dwmw2.1) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:01:48 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [62.195.31.207 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [62.195.31.207 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 15:47 +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > > Do you think this would change 2.4-cdrom behavior incompatibly? > It is not that extreme I think... wrong question ;) for a very frozen tree like 2.4... the question is: what is the pressing reason to add this. Not: why not add it.