mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Shantanu Goel <sgoel01@yahoo.com>
Cc: Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3 multiple thread streaming write performance with 2.6.9
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:00:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098950444.2642.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028040421.80505.qmail@web12826.mail.yahoo.com>

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 21:04 -0700, Shantanu Goel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am seeing extremely variable and poor performance
> with ext3 in the presence of multiple streaming
> writers.  Below are the results of some tests I have
> conducted with iozone.  XFS appears to be most
> consistent performer for this workload, followed by
> ext2 and finally ext3.  Has this been observed
> elsewhere?  If so, is it possible to tune ext3 to
> perform better on this workload?

yes you should use the reservations patch from the -mm tree;
see http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/reservations.png for a graph of the difference 


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-28  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-28  4:04 Shantanu Goel
2004-10-28  8:00 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-10-28 18:44   ` Shantanu Goel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1098950444.2642.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgoel01@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®