mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>,
	Openais List <openais@lists.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9 kernel oops with openais
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:11:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099095114.1207.16.camel@persist.az.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041029170129.W2357@build.pdx.osdl.net>

What would be preferrable instead of dropping UID when privleged
services are needed?  more specifically I need
    * CAP_NET_RAW (bindtodevice)
     * CAP_SYS_NICE (setscheduler)
     * CAP_IPC_LOCK (mlockall)

I had thought about adding the correct code to get these capabilities
but it still requires a start-from-uid0 environment

THanks
-steve

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 17:01, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Steven Dake (sdake@mvista.com) wrote:
> > The change was that from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9 the rlimit for memlock was
> > changed from infinity to 32k (and at the same time, normal users are now
> > allowed to use mlockall if they dont have alot of memory to mlock).  I
> > fixed up the openais code by doing something evil from uid 0 like:
> > 
> >        struct rlimit rlimit;
> > 
> >         rlimit.rlim_cur = RLIM_INFINITY;
> >         rlimit.rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY;
> >         setrlimit (RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlimit);
> 
> Yeah, that'll do it (although, certainly wouldn't hurt to size it
> down ;-).  Hopefully most users aren't dropping uid (I doubt it, since
> I hadn't seen this problem pop up before).
> 
> thanks,
> -chris


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-30  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-29 22:51 Steven Dake
2004-10-29 23:08 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-10-29 23:16   ` Steven Dake
2004-10-29 23:39     ` Chris Wright
2004-10-29 23:44       ` Steven Dake
2004-10-29 23:45         ` Chris Wright
2004-10-29 23:57           ` Steven Dake
2004-10-30  0:01             ` Chris Wright
2004-10-30  0:11               ` Steven Dake [this message]
2004-10-30  0:19                 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-30  0:42                 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 23:42   ` Steven Dake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1099095114.1207.16.camel@persist.az.mvista.com \
    --to=sdake@mvista.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markh@osdl.org \
    --cc=openais@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®