From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
Cc: tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, git@amd.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
amitrkcian2002@gmail.com,
Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR if WP# signal not connected
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:38:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10ae0cdbaf4b080d337ab4945d335f25@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630142233.63585-3-amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
Am 2023-06-30 16:22, schrieb Amit Kumar Mahapatra:
> Setting the status register write disable (SRWD) bit in the status
> register (SR) with WP# signal of the flash left floating or wrongly
> tied to
> GND (that includes internal pull-downs), will configure the SR
> permanently
> as read-only. If WP# signal is left floating or wrongly tied to GND,
> avoid
> setting SRWD bit while writing the SR during flash protection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 3 +++
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h | 1 +
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c | 1 +
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c | 9 +++++++--
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 0bb0ad14a2fc..520f5ab86d2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -2864,6 +2864,9 @@ static void spi_nor_init_flags(struct spi_nor
> *nor)
> if (flags & NO_CHIP_ERASE)
> nor->flags |= SNOR_F_NO_OP_CHIP_ERASE;
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "no-wp"))
> + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_NO_WP;
> +
Not moved below the first of_property_read_bool() in that function
(as pointed out before). It's just a minor nit.
But with or without that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> if (flags & SPI_NOR_RWW && nor->info->n_banks > 1 &&
> !nor->controller_ops)
> nor->flags |= SNOR_F_RWW;
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> index 4fb5ff09c63a..55b5e7abce6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags {
> SNOR_F_SWP_IS_VOLATILE = BIT(13),
> SNOR_F_RWW = BIT(14),
> SNOR_F_ECC = BIT(15),
> + SNOR_F_NO_WP = BIT(16),
> };
>
> struct spi_nor_read_command {
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
> b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
> index e11536fffe0f..6e163cb5b478 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/debugfs.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static const char *const snor_f_names[] = {
> SNOR_F_NAME(SWP_IS_VOLATILE),
> SNOR_F_NAME(RWW),
> SNOR_F_NAME(ECC),
> + SNOR_F_NAME(NO_WP),
> };
> #undef SNOR_F_NAME
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> index 0ba716e84377..5ab9d5324860 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> @@ -214,8 +214,13 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor,
> loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>
> status_new = (status_old & ~mask & ~tb_mask) | val;
>
> - /* Disallow further writes if WP pin is asserted */
> - status_new |= SR_SRWD;
> + /*
> + * Disallow further writes if WP# pin is neither left floating nor
> + * wrongly tied to GND (that includes internal pull-downs).
> + * WP# pin hard strapped to GND can be a valid use case.
> + */
> + if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_WP))
> + status_new |= SR_SRWD;
>
> if (!use_top)
> status_new |= tb_mask;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 14:22 [PATCH v4 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-30 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: jedec, spi-nor: Add DT property to avoid setting SRWD bit in status register Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-30 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR if WP# signal not connected Amit Kumar Mahapatra
2023-06-30 14:38 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2023-07-13 2:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: Avoid setting SRWD bit in SR Tudor Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10ae0cdbaf4b080d337ab4945d335f25@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=amit.kumar-mahapatra@amd.com \
--cc=amitrkcian2002@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=git@amd.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®