From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262496AbUKQTX2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:23:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262423AbUKQTVf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:21:35 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:63390 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262460AbUKQTUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:20:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] inotify: vfs_permission was replaced From: Robert Love To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: ttb@tentacle.dhs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20041117191803.GA11830@infradead.org> References: <1100710677.6280.2.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <1100714560.6280.7.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20041117190850.GA11682@infradead.org> <1100718601.4981.2.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20041117191803.GA11830@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:17:32 -0500 Message-Id: <1100719052.4981.4.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 19:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > No it doesn't. Please try to understand the APIs before you're using them. > Just looking at the callers should give you an immediate clue. Maybe you should look at the code in question. We actually want to perform the exact same sort of permission checks that, say, read performs. Robert Love