From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261620AbULFTT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:19:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261619AbULFTT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:19:27 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:38838 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261620AbULFTTZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:19:25 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc3 vs clock From: john stultz To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Cc: lkml In-Reply-To: <200412041111.16055.gene.heskett@verizon.net> References: <200412041111.16055.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1102360783.13294.132.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:19:53 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 08:11, Gene Heskett wrote: > At -rc2 my clock kept fairly decent time, but -rc3 is running fast, > about 30 seconds an hour fast. Hmm. Could you send me your dmesg output from both rc2 and rc3 boots? thanks -john