From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261956AbULGWmE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:42:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261957AbULGWl1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:41:27 -0500 Received: from smtp2.eldosales.com ([63.78.12.18]:61195 "EHLO tweeter.eldosales.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261956AbULGWlQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:41:16 -0500 Posted-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:41:09 -0700 Subject: Re: qla2xxx fail over bug? From: comsatcat Reply-To: comsatcat@earthlink.net To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20041207090342.GB13591@infradead.org> References: <1102399799.12866.3.camel@solaris.skunkware.org> <20041207090342.GB13591@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:41:12 -0700 Message-Id: <1102459272.9757.1.camel@solaris.skunkware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > There's not such printk in the kernel qla2xxx driver, so the bugs is > in front of the computer as you patched in a bogus vendor driver. > I apologize, the version of the qla2xxx driver was obtained from qlogic's ftp site. I assumed it was the beta versions being developed at the qla2xxx sourceforge site as their ftp was referenced for updated version (which I understand is the ones that get worked into the kernel?). I will contact qlogic directly. Thanks, Ben