From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261787AbULHE1f (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:27:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262016AbULHE1f (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:27:35 -0500 Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.106]:24028 "EHLO mx03.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261787AbULHE1d (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:27:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9 From: jamal Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: Patrick McHardy Cc: Thomas Graf , Andrew Morton , Thomas Cataldo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> References: <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@osdl.org> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41B5E188.5050800@trash.net> <20041207170748.GF1371@postel.suug.ch> <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: jamalopolous Message-Id: <1102480044.1050.9.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 Dec 2004 23:27:25 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 12:23, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Either one is fine with me, although I would prefer to see > the number of ifdefs in this area going down, not up :) You guys pick one or other or a mix. I run 4 base testcases for the policer typically: 1) Old kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass 2) old kernel, old tc (trivial - expected to pass). 3) New Kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass 4) New Kernel, uptodate TC - MUST pass (although trivial) Try both setting, dumping then deleting policies. If these tests pass, please push patch to Dave. cheers, jamal